2. Coding, Duration, and Capacity of Memory

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

Clive Wearing

suffered a brain infection

STM duration 7-30 seconds (damage to hippocampus)

unable to store new memories or control his emotions

retrograde amnesia

2
New cards

Jacobs (1887)

investigated capacity of STM

digit span test

7 +- 2 items

chunking increases accuracy of recall

suggests capacity of STM limited

3
New cards

Peterson & Peterson (1959)

A: investigated duration of STM

P: gave pps a consonant trigram. they were asked to recall the consonant syllable after a particular interval of time (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 seconds). during this interval of time, pps would count backwards from a number (to prevent verbal rehearsal)

F: pps were 90% correct after 3 seconds but only 2% correct after 18 seconds

C: suggests STM has duration of 18 seconds without rehearsal

4
New cards

define memory

the process of retaining information after the original stimulus is no longer present

5
New cards

define capactiy

how much information can be held

6
New cards

define duration

how long a memory can be held before it is no longer available

7
New cards

define coding

how we change information to store it in our memory

8
New cards

one limitation is research findings for the capacity of STM are limited

Cowan (2001) reviewed many studies on STM and found STM is likely to be more limited than 7 chunks

research on STM is varied and suggests a more limited capacity of STM than what Jacobs found

research on the capacity of STM lacks reliability

9
New cards

one limitation is the effect of individual differences on the capacity of STM

Jacobs found digit recall increased with age = 8 year olds recalled 6.6 digits on avg whereas 19 year olds recalled 8.6 digits on avg

findings are non-generalisable to whole population

lacks population validity

10
New cards

one limitation is research on the duration of STM lacks mundane realism

Peterson & Peterson (1959) made pps memorise 3 consonants with no meaning = this artificial task does not reflect everyday uses of STM

however, there is some relevance to everyday life such as memorising phone numbers or postcodes

questionable applications to real life

11
New cards

one limitation of research on the duration of STM is the findings may have been due to displacement

Peterson & Peterson (1959), pps were counting the numbers in their STM which may displace the syllables to be remembered

Reitman (1974) used auditory tones instead of numbers so that displacement wouldn’t occur and found that the duration of STM was longer

suggests that forgetting in the Petersons’ study was due to displacement rather than decay = they did not measure what it set out to measure
lacks internal validity

12
New cards

Bahrick et al (1975)

A: investigate duration of LTM

P: 400 pps of various ages were tested on their memory of their former classmates using either a photo-recognition test of 50 photos or a free-recall test (listed names)

F: photo-recognition = pps who were tested within 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate in identifying classmates, compared to 70% after 48 years

free-recall = 60% accuracy after 15 years, 30% accuracy after 48 years

C: LTM has a large duration especially if visual images are shown = unlimited duration

13
New cards

Baddeley (1966)

A: investigate coding of STM and LTM

P: showed pps two word lists (one with acoustically similar but semantically different words, and vice-versa) and made them recall each list

F: pps had reduced accurate recall with the acoustically similar words in STM but not LTM, whereas had reduced accurate recall with semantically similar words in LTM but not STM

C: suggests STM is encoded acoustically whereas LTM is encoded semantically

14
New cards

one limitation of research into the coding of STM and LTM is there are methodological issues

Baddeley (1966) tested STM by asking pps to recall a word list immediately after hearing it, whereas LTM was testing by waiting 20 minutes

questionable as to whether this time period is long enough to test LTM

questionable internal validity

15
New cards

one limitation of the coding of LTM is LTM may not be exclusively semantic

Frost (1972) showed that long-term recall was related to visual as well as semantic categories

Nelson and Rothbart (1972) found evidence of acoustic coding in LTM

suggests coding in LTM is not exclusively semantic but can vary depending on circumstances

OSZAR »